Know what
breaks before
it breaks you.

Survival infrastructure for protocols when normal assumptions fail. SCE maps control risk, incident exposure, and authority gaps before a threat-matrix event becomes a public failure.

Request Defense Review  →Explore the Continuity Engine  →
Zero-custody. Public metadata only. No keys. No signing authority.
LIVE CRITICAL INCIDENTS
Critical incident feed temporarily unavailable•Live case feed reconnecting•Case Library sync pending•Review recent incidents in the Case Library•Critical incident feed temporarily unavailable•Live case feed reconnecting•Case Library sync pending•Review recent incidents in the Case Library•
The Continuity Mandate

Every protocol has a threat matrix. Most teams only see it after the incident.

SCE exists for the moment assumptions stop being true. When a chain halts, an oracle drifts, governance freezes, a treasury path fails, or a critical authority surface becomes unsafe, continuity becomes authority.

1. Authority Surfaces
Upgrades, pause authority, treasury movement, admin roles, keepers, oracle control paths.
→
2. Threat Matrix Exposure
Maps protocol surfaces to global exploit and failure patterns.
→
3. Continuity Doctrine
Pause, degrade, evacuate, substitute, reconstitute.
→
4. Verification Workflows
Evidence requested, controls tracked, verification status maintained.
→
Built for the moment your assumptions fail.
Not an audit replacement

Why SCE vs. an audit

Audits review code. SCE reviews whether the system can survive control failure.

Traditional Audit
Code and implementation assurance
  • Code exploitability review
  • Contract-level vulnerabilities
  • Implementation flaws
  • Best once contracts are near final
VS
Sagitta Continuity Engine
Continuity and control readiness
  • Authority surface mapping
  • Treasury, oracle, governance, and admin-path risk
  • Emergency response and control verification
  • Best before launch and before capital scales
Complements audit work.
See Defense Review  →
How SCE Works

When the threat-matrix
event happens, SCE is
already holding the map.

1
Monitor incidents
Continuously ingest SCE, Web, GitHub, advisories, and DeFi/REST feeds.
2
Map protocol surface
Register public contracts, addresses, roles, and admin paths.
3
Detect authority risks
Determine admin-surface risks across EOAs, contracts, and policy.
4
Match threat families
Project findings are mapped to global threat families and tactics.
5
Recommend controls
Controls recommended are generated from findings and doctrine.
6
Track evidence
Capture, normalize, and link evidence across findings and reviews.
7
Deliver defense review
Send a SCE-structured report with verification status and next actions.
SCE does not monitor systems for comfort.
It maps what must survive when conditions break.
Ecosystem Coverage

Built for multi-chain protocol defense

Coverage begins with EVM authority-surface reviews and expands through chain-specific adapters.

Active now
LIVE
EVM authority-surface reviews
EVMEthereum-compatible deploymentsTestnet & mainnetAdmin / owner pathsProxy patternsTreasury controlsOracle surfacesGovernance / timelocks
EVM-compatible coverage targets
EthereumBaseArbitrumOptimismPolygonAvalanche C-ChainBNB ChainMoonbeam
Active EVM coverage applies where public contract data, explorer records, or project-submitted details are available.
Expansion targets
PLANNED
Chain-specific adapters
SolanaAO / ArweaveICPCosmosBridgesOracle networksEcosystem dashboards
Grant / ecosystem fit
Infrastructure for builder readiness

SCE supports ecosystem-wide readiness programs — authority-risk mapping, control identification, and evidence preparation — before capital scales.

Discuss ecosystem coverage  →
Designed to support ecosystem-wide builder readiness programs.
Sample Pre-Launch Defense Review

What a Defense Review contains

Demo report using Sagitta Protocol testnet deployment.

Shows report structure, authority-surface mapping, evidence workflow, control checks, and next actions. This is a sample Pre-Launch Defense Review — not a verified client result or a completed review.

SAGITTA
Continuity Engine
SAMPLE PDF
Pre-Launch Defense Review
Pre-Launch
Continuity Review
Project
Sagitta Protocol
Environment
Testnet
Review Type
Public-Surface
Coverage
0/29 verified
1 - Executive Summary
2 - Review Scope & Assets
3 - Severity Methodology
4 - Authority Risk Findings
5 - Relevant Threat Families
6 - Recommended Controls
7 - Verification Status
8 - Next Actions
The report

See the deliverable

A structured review covering mapped assets, authority surfaces, threat-family relevance, control checks, and remediation priorities.

5 mapped assets29 control checks5 threat families0 keys required
Mapped assets and authority surfaces
Threat-family relevance and risk summary
Evidence status and missing controls
Verification coverage
Findings, severity, and next actions
Executive summary for stakeholders
Zero-custody · No keys · No signing authority
View sample report  →Demo PDF · Sagitta Protocol testnet
First Service Door

SCE Defense Review

A protocol survival review
before the emergency.

Built on the Sagitta Continuity Engine, the Defense Review maps your public protocol surface against authority-risk patterns, global incident families, continuity doctrine, and evidence gaps.

Starter Defense Review
$3,000
Up to 5 public contracts or assets
  • Public asset mapping
  • Authority-risk findings
  • Relevant threat-family mapping
  • Recommended controls
  • Evidence and verification tracking
  • Client-ready report
What You Provide
  • Project name
  • Chain / network
  • Explorer links
  • Docs / repo
  • Optional admin evidence
What You Receive
  • Mapped assets
  • Authority findings
  • Controls
  • Verification status
  • Next actions
Request Defense Review  →View How It Works  →
Manual service. Powered internally by Sagitta Continuity Engine (SCE). No keys. No wallet access. No signing rights.
Proof asset: sample Pre-Launch Defense Review available. Review the demo PDF before requesting a Defense Review.
Questions Before Review

Frequently asked questions

Clear answers for teams evaluating an SCE Defense Review.

Is SCE a smart contract audit?

No. SCE complements audits; it does not replace them. Audits review code, implementation flaws, and exploit paths. SCE reviews continuity and control readiness: authority surfaces, admin paths, treasury controls, oracle dependencies, governance and timelock posture, keeper and liveness assumptions, emergency procedures, and evidence coverage.

Do you need access to our keys or wallets?

No. Never. SCE does not request private keys, seed phrases, custody access, signing authority, or transaction approval rights.

What do we need to provide?

At minimum, provide contract addresses, deployment chain, project context, and any known admin, multisig, timelock, oracle, treasury, keeper, or governance configuration. Optional evidence can include policy documents, multisig screenshots, governance proposals, runbooks, emergency procedures, or links to public documentation.

Is this useful before mainnet?

Yes. Pre-launch testnet reviews are one of the strongest use cases. Authority patterns, timelocks, multisigs, oracle fallbacks, treasury controls, and emergency procedures are easier to improve before mainnet deployment and before capital scales.

Which chains does SCE support?

Active now: EVM and Ethereum-compatible deployments where public contract data, explorer records, or project-submitted details are available. Coverage targets: Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche C-Chain, BNB Chain, Moonbeam. Expansion targets: Solana, AO / Arweave, ICP, Cosmos, bridges, and oracle networks through future chain-specific adapters.

What do we receive?

You receive a structured Defense Review report covering mapped assets, control findings, threat-family relevance, evidence status, severity framing, and next actions. When evidence is submitted, SCE can generate an updated report showing improved verification coverage.

Does SCE certify that our protocol is safe?

No. SCE does not guarantee safety or certify that a protocol cannot fail. A Defense Review identifies public-surface continuity risks, missing evidence, and control gaps so teams can improve readiness and make better decisions.

Who is this for?

SCE Defense Reviews are built for protocol teams, DAOs, DeFi systems, treasury-heavy projects, grant programs, ecosystem foundations, and infrastructure teams that need a clearer view of control failure, authority concentration, oracle risk, treasury posture, and emergency readiness.

How is this different from monitoring tools?

Monitoring tools alert teams after signals appear. SCE focuses on readiness before failure: mapping control risk, linking findings to known threat families, identifying missing controls, and preparing evidence and procedures before an incident occurs.

Can ecosystems or grant programs use SCE?

Yes. SCE supports ecosystem-wide readiness programs — authority-risk mapping, control gap identification, and evidence preparation before mainnet.

Do not wait for your incident
to reveal your control gaps.

Request Defense Review  →Enter Portal  →